CCJRNL

DARPA & Storytelling

Stories exert a powerful influence on human thoughts and behavior. They consolidate
memory, shape emotions, cue heuristics and biases in judgment, influence in-group/out-group distinctions, and may affect the fundamental contents of personal identity.

 

Yes, yes, stories are touchy feely but important, yes.

 

It comes as no surprise that these influences make stories highly relevant to vexing security challenges such as radicalization, violent social mobilization, insurgency and terrorism, and conflict prevention and resolution. Therefore, understanding the role stories play in a security context is a matter of great import and some urgency.

Wait, WHAT. Now you have my attention.

 

Ascertaining exactly what function stories enact, and by what mechanisms they do so, is a necessity if we are to effectively analyze the security phenomena shaped by stories. Doing this in a scientifically respectable manner requires a working theory of narratives, an understanding of what role narratives play in security contexts, and examination of how to best analyze stories—decomposing them and their psychological impact systematically.

If you skipped that paragraph, here's the important part:

 

To encourage and stimulate discussion and research on these issues, the Defense Sciences Office (DSO) of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is hosting a workshop, Stories, Neuroscience and Experimental Technologies (STORyNET): Analysis and Decomposition of Narratives in Security Contexts.

 

OK, mind blown. That was DARPA, the R&D wing of the US Department of Defense, announcing a conference on STORYTELLING. Kudos to DARPA for pushing the envelope not just in the telekinetic monkey department, but in bringing in "soft" factors like how narratives form and stick. It's about time we actually had some new thinking about how hearts and minds are actually won.

via Bruce Sterling at wired.com

And here's the conference agenda:

Click here to download:
STORyNET_Workshop_Agenda_2-28-11.pdf (144 KB)
(download)

Filed under  //   DARPA   security  

A more-or-less permanent constraint on strategies of secret-keeping

Yet the debate over WikiLeaks has proceeded as if the matter might conclude with the eradication of these kinds of data dumps—as if this is a temporary glitch in the system that can be fixed; as if this is a nuisance that can be made to go away with the application of sufficient government gusto. But I don't think the matter can end this way. Just as technology has made it easier for governments and corporations to snoop ever more invasively into the private lives of individuals, it has also made it easier for individuals, working alone or together, to root through and make off with the secret files of governments and corporations. WikiLeaks is simply an early manifestation of what I predict will be a more-or-less permanent feature of contemporary life, and a more-or-less permanent constraint on strategies of secret-keeping.  

The Economist on Wikileaks as an early indicator that security and secrecy are changing and future large leaks are inevitable. via @sambr

Filed under  //   security   transparency